Tools / Strategy Validation
Evidence Coverage Scorecard
Map the current evidence behind a systematic strategy across five validation layers. The result measures research readiness, not expected profitability.
Assessment
Important validation layers remain incomplete.
Historical evidence is present, but OOS, stress and forward coverage are not yet strong enough for a mature validation claim.
Research gates
0 / 4 passedA numerical score cannot compensate for failed forward evidence, poor execution quality or a non-representative test design.
Transparent weighting
What the score measures
The score reflects declared evidence coverage across five layers. Historical evidence contributes 20%, OOS/recent-market evidence 25%, stress resilience 20%, forward observation 25% and parameter stability 10%. Data quality and sample size apply limited modifiers.
Methodology and limitations
This scorecard is an educational framework for organising evidence. Status selections are self-declared and are not independently verified. The output is not a quality certificate, investment recommendation, forecast, probability of success or substitute for reviewing source reports, execution records, assumptions and failure cases. A strategy with a high score can still lose money or fail under future market conditions.